1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Sociology
  4. Volume 39, 2013
  5. Article

Annual Review of Sociology

Volume 39, 2013

Formations and Formalisms: Charles Tilly and the Paradox of the Actor

Abstract

Charles Tilly (1929–2008) was a pioneer in joining sociology and history. Throughout his career, he was especially concerned with the ways in which ordinary people made political claims, and how this was shaped by transformations in the state and in capitalism. Most often seen as a structuralist, Tilly was nevertheless deeply concerned with how to understand actors. This article traces Tilly's work from early research on French contention through his later, synthetic work on mechanisms and regimes to show how Tilly's understanding of actors, agency, culture, and social construction developed. Further, we show how this development went hand in hand with Tilly's development of distinctive methodological approaches to historical and sociological data.

Keyword(s): actors, Biography, Charles Tilly, contentious politics, formalisms, mechanisms, repertoires, state formation
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145547
2013-07-30
2024-06-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/soc/39/1/annurev-soc-071312-145547.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145547&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ashforth A. 2005. Witchcraft, Violence, and Democracy in South Africa Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  2. Auyero J. 2003. Contentious Lives: Two Argentine Women, Two Protests, and the Quest for Recognition Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  3. Auyero J, Moran T. 2007. The dynamics of collective violence: dissecting food riots in contemporary Argentina. Soc. Forces 85:31341–67 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barker C. 2003. Review of Doug McAdam, Sidney Tarrow and Charles Tilly, Dynamics of Contention, Cambridge, 2001, and of Ronald R. Aminzade, Jack A. Goldstone, Doug McAdam, Elizabeth J. Perry, William H. Sewell, Jr., Sidney Tarrow and Charles Tilly, Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, Cambridge, 2001. Sociology 37:605–8 [Google Scholar]
  5. Barkey K. 2008. Empire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  7. Bourdieu P. 1993. The Logic of Practice Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  8. Castañeda E. 2009. Charles Tilly: connecting large-scale social change and personal narrative. Sociol. Res. Online 14:524 [Google Scholar]
  9. Demetriou C. 2007. Political violence and legitimation: the episode of colonial Cyprus. Qual. Sociol. 30:171–93 [Google Scholar]
  10. Demetriou C. 2009. The realist approach to explanatory mechanisms in social science: more than a heuristic?. Philos. Soc. Sci. 39:440–64 [Google Scholar]
  11. Demetriou C. 2012. Processual comparative sociology: building on the approach of Charles Tilly. Sociol. Theory 30:151–65 [Google Scholar]
  12. Emirbayer M. 2010. Tilly and Bourdieu. See Koller & Nichols 2010 400–22
  13. Erikson E, Bearman PS. 2008. Routes into networks: the structure of English East Indian trade, 1600–1831. Am. J. Sociol. 112:1195–230 [Google Scholar]
  14. Erikson E, Parent JM. 2010. Central authority and order. Sociol. Theory 25:3245–67 [Google Scholar]
  15. Falleti TG, Lynch J. 2008. From process to mechanism: varieties of disaggregation. Qual. Sociol. 31:4333–39 [Google Scholar]
  16. Franzosi R. 2004. From Words to Numbers Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  17. Fukase-Indergaard F, Indergaard M. 2008. Religious nationalism and the making of the modern Japanese state. Theory Soc. 37:4343–74 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gamson WA. 1975. The Strategy of Social Protest Boston, MA: Dorsey [Google Scholar]
  19. Goldstone J. 2010. From structure to agency to process: the evolution of Charles Tilly's theories of social action as reflected in his analyses of contentious politics. See Koller & Nichols 2010 358–67
  20. Gross N. 2010. Charles Tilly and American pragmatism. See Koller & Nichols 2010 337–57
  21. Hanagan M, Tilly C. 2011. Contention and Trust in Cities and States New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  22. Hillmann H. 2008. Localism and the limits of political brokerage: evidence from revolutionary Vermont. Am. J. Sociol. 114:287–331 [Google Scholar]
  23. Koller A, Nichols L. 2010. Special Issue on the Legacy of Charles Tilly. The American Sociologist 414 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  24. Koopmans R. 2003. A failed revolution—but a worthy cause. Mobilization 8:116–19 [Google Scholar]
  25. Koopmans R. 2004. Movements and media: selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere. Theory Soc. 33:367–91 [Google Scholar]
  26. Krinsky J. 2007. Free Labor: Workfare and the Contested Language of Neoliberalism Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  27. Krinsky J. 2008. Changing minds: cognition and culture in the opposition to workfare in New York City. Soc. Mov. Stud. 7:11–30 [Google Scholar]
  28. Krinsky J, Barker C. 2009. Movement strategizing as developmental learning: perspectives from Cultural Historical Activity Theory. Culture, Protest, and Social Movements H Johnston 209–28 Aldershot: Ashgate [Google Scholar]
  29. Leifer E. 1988. Interaction preludes to role-setting: exploratory local action. Am. Sociol. Rev. 53:6865–78 [Google Scholar]
  30. Machamer P, Darden L, Craver CF. 2000. Thinking about mechanisms. Philos. Sci. 67:11–25 [Google Scholar]
  31. McAdam D, Tarrow S, Tilly C. 2001. Dynamics of Contention Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  32. Mische A. 2003. Crosstalk in social movements: reconceiving the culture-network link. Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action M Diani, D McAdam 258–80 Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  33. Mische A. 2008. Partisan Publics: Communication and Contention Across Brazilian Youth Activist Networks Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  34. Mische A. 2011. Relational sociology, culture, and agency. The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis J Scott, P Harrington 80–97 London: Sage [Google Scholar]
  35. Mohr JW, White HC. 2006. How to model an institution. Theory Soc. 37:485–512 [Google Scholar]
  36. Norkus Z. 2005. Mechanisms as miracle makers? The rise and inconsistencies of the “mechanismic approach” in social science and history. Hist. Theory 44:3348–72 [Google Scholar]
  37. O'Connor J. 2002 (1973). The Fiscal Crisis of the State New York: St. Martin's, 2nd ed.. [Google Scholar]
  38. Oliver P. 2003. Mechanisms of contention. Mobilization 8:119–22 [Google Scholar]
  39. Oliver PE, Maney GM. 2000. Political processes and local newspaper coverage of protest events: from selection bias to triadic interactions. Am. J. Sociol. 106:2463–505 [Google Scholar]
  40. Parigi P, Sartori L. 2012. The political party as a network of cleavages: disclosing the inner structure of Italian political parties in the seventies. Soc. Netw. In press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2012.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  41. Polletta F. 1998. “It was like a fever…” Narrative and identity in social protest. Soc. Probl. 45:137–59 [Google Scholar]
  42. Poros M. 2011. Modern Migrations: Gujarati Indian Networks in New York and London. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  43. Roy B. 1994. Some Trouble with Cows: Making Sense of Social Conflict. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  44. Schwartz M. 2008. A postscript to Catnets. Sociologica 1/2008. http://www.sociologica.mulino.it/doi/10.2383/26577 [Google Scholar]
  45. Sewell WH Jr. 1996. Three temporalities: toward an “eventful” sociology. The Historic Turn in the Human Sciences TJ McDonald 245–80 Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press [Google Scholar]
  46. Shorter E, Tilly C. 1974. Strikes in France, 1830–1968. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  47. Smith T. 2004. Boundary stories and the development of narrative differences Presented at Grad. Stud. Retreat Soc. Comp. Res., May 15, Univ. Calif., San Diego. http://socsci2.ucsd.edu/∼aronatas/scrretreat/index.htm [Google Scholar]
  48. Steinberg MW. 1999. Fighting Words: Working-Class Formation, Collective Action, and Discourse in Early Nineteenth Century England Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  49. Steinmetz G. 2010. Charles Tilly, German historicism, and the critical realist philosophy of science. See Koller & Nichols 2010 312–36
  50. Stetsenko A. 2005. Activity as object-related: resolving the dichotomy of individual and collective planes of activity. Mind Cult. Act. 12:170–88 [Google Scholar]
  51. Stinchcombe AL. 1978. Theoretical Methods in Social History New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  52. Stone D. 1997. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decisionmaking New York: Norton [Google Scholar]
  53. Tarrow S. 1996. The people's two rhythms: Charles Tilly and the study of contentious politics. A review article. Comp. Stud. Soc. Hist. 38:3586–600 [Google Scholar]
  54. Tarrow S. 2008. Charles Tilly and the practice of contentious politics. Soc. Mov. Stud. 7:225–46 [Google Scholar]
  55. Tarrow S. 2012. Strangers at the Gates: Movements and States in Contentious Politics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  56. Thompson EP. 1963. The Making of the English Working Class New York: Pantheon [Google Scholar]
  57. Tilly C. 1964. The Vendée Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press/London: Edward Arnold [Google Scholar]
  58. Tilly C. 1966. Codebook for intensive sample of disturbances Res. Data Collect. ICPSR 0051, Inter-Univ. Consort. Polit. Soc. Res., Ann Arbor, Mich. http://prod.library.utoronto.ca/datalib/codebooks/icpsr/0051/cb0051.pdf [Google Scholar]
  59. Tilly C. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley [Google Scholar]
  60. Tilly C. 1981a. As Sociology Meets History New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  61. Tilly C. 1981b. Introduction. Class Conflict and Collective Action LA Tilly, C Tilly 13–25 Beverly Hills, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
  62. Tilly C. 1985. Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  63. Tilly C. 1986. The Contentious French Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  64. Tilly C. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1990. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  65. Tilly C. 1993. European Revolutions, 1492–1992. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell [Google Scholar]
  66. Tilly C. 1994. Entanglements of European cities and states. Cities and the Rise of States in Europe, AD 1000–1800 C Tilly, W Blockmans 1–27 Boulder, CO: Westview [Google Scholar]
  67. Tilly C. 1995. Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  68. Tilly C. 1997. Parliamentarization of popular contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Theory Soc. 26:245–73 [Google Scholar]
  69. Tilly C. 1998a. Contentious conversation. Soc. Res. 65:491–510 [Google Scholar]
  70. Tilly C. 1998b. Durable Inequality Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  71. Tilly C. 2002. Stories, Identities, and Political Change Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield [Google Scholar]
  72. Tilly C. 2003. The Politics of Collective Violence Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  73. Tilly C. 2004a. Contention and Democracy in Europe, 1650–2000 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  74. Tilly C. 2004b. Social Movements, 1768–2004 Boulder, CO: Paradigm [Google Scholar]
  75. Tilly C. 2005a. Identities, Boundaries, and Social Ties Boulder, CO: Paradigm [Google Scholar]
  76. Tilly C. 2005b. Trust and Rule New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  77. Tilly C. 2005c. Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834 Boulder, CO: Paradigm. Revis. paperback ed. [Google Scholar]
  78. Tilly C. 2006a. Regimes and Repertoires Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  79. Tilly C. 2006b. Why? Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  80. Tilly C. 2007a. Afterword: political ethnography as art and science. New Perspectives on Political Ethnography L Joseph, M Mahler, J Auyero 247–50 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  81. Tilly C. 2007b. Democracy Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  82. Tilly C. 2008a. Contentious Performances Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  83. Tilly C. 2008b. Credit and Blame Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  84. Tilly C. 2008c. Explaining Social Processes Boulder, CO: Paradigm [Google Scholar]
  85. Tilly C, Tilly C. 1998. Work Under Capitalism Boulder, CO: Westview [Google Scholar]
  86. Tilly C, Tilly LA, Tilly R. 1975. The Rebellious Century, 1830–1930 Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  87. Tilly C, Wood LJ. 2003. Contentious connections in Great Britain, 1828–1834. Social Movements and Networks. Relational Approaches to Collective Active M Diani, D McAdam 147–72 Oxford, UK/New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  88. Vedres B, Csigo P. 2002. Negotiating the end of transition: a network approach to political discourse dynamics, Hungary 1997 ISERP Work. Pap. 02-06, Inst. Soc. Econ. Theory Res., Columbia Univ. http://academiccommons.columbia.edu/item/ac:129211 [Google Scholar]
  89. Wada T. 2012. Modularity and transferability of repertoires of contention. Soc. Probl. 59:4544–71 [Google Scholar]
  90. White HC. 1992. Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  91. Wood LJ. 2012. Direct Action, Deliberation, and Diffusion: Collective Action After the WTO Protests in Seattle New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  92. Zelizer V. 2006. Why and how to read Why?. Qual. Sociol. 29:531–34 [Google Scholar]
  93. Zelizer V. 2010. Chuck Tilly and Mozart. Am. Sociol. 41:4423–28 [Google Scholar]
  94. Zerubavel E. 1993. The Fine Line: Making Distinctions in Everyday Life. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-soc-071312-145547
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error